Democracy - we so need to abolish the role of the Party Whip, and dis-establish the Party Whips Office in Parliament - it is 100% anti-democratic.
No argument. Completely Ant-Democratic, in spirit and in action. Amoral Pragmatism.
The Party Whips Office is an official body within Parliament, and is a body charted to enforce 'The Party Line' in the most vague terms, allowing for unregulated, secret coercive behaviour (alluded to, yet never subject to oversight, let alone exposure by formal disclosure) which will quite often be in opposition to the will and intent of the whole of the constituency the MP represents but more fundamentally, in opposition to the very notion of Democracy itself,
Because the MP is representing the entire constituency, not merely those who voted for that MP.
The MP represents groups of people who live together, and who do not agree, ot who see things differently, from different experiences, etc...
The MP is a bridge, - between the people, as they are, and the law making Parliament, as it is, and that role is acclaimed by all, world wide.
That said, an honest, democratic MP cannot serve both the full constituency, and the Party, unless
they are somehow aligned.. and if they are not, then why are they not talking about it in ways to resolve what business lies before them?
She knows this. She's suggested this. Who?
shhhhhhhshhh.
Never, ever, ever, ever mentioned in the straight-world media or school historical texts, no BBC Documentary will reveal this,... no one is allowed to even think about, let alone question that 'tradition' in the 'mother of all parliaments' (a whopper, a Big Mac of a Lie - it is not the first of it's kind, anywhere).....
The Emperor has No Clothes.
We Have No Functioning Democracy.
No argument. Completely Ant-Democratic, in spirit and in action. Amoral Pragmatism.
The Party Whips Office is an official body within Parliament, and is a body charted to enforce 'The Party Line' in the most vague terms, allowing for unregulated, secret coercive behaviour (alluded to, yet never subject to oversight, let alone exposure by formal disclosure) which will quite often be in opposition to the will and intent of the whole of the constituency the MP represents but more fundamentally, in opposition to the very notion of Democracy itself,
Because the MP is representing the entire constituency, not merely those who voted for that MP.
The MP represents groups of people who live together, and who do not agree, ot who see things differently, from different experiences, etc...
The MP is a bridge, - between the people, as they are, and the law making Parliament, as it is, and that role is acclaimed by all, world wide.
That said, an honest, democratic MP cannot serve both the full constituency, and the Party, unless
they are somehow aligned.. and if they are not, then why are they not talking about it in ways to resolve what business lies before them?
She knows this. She's suggested this. Who?
shhhhhhhshhh.
Never, ever, ever, ever mentioned in the straight-world media or school historical texts, no BBC Documentary will reveal this,... no one is allowed to even think about, let alone question that 'tradition' in the 'mother of all parliaments' (a whopper, a Big Mac of a Lie - it is not the first of it's kind, anywhere).....
The Emperor has No Clothes.
We Have No Functioning Democracy.
Kindest regards
Corneilius
"Do what you love, it's Your Gift to Universe"
Thank you for reading this blog. All we need to do is be really honest, responsive to the evidence we find,and ready to reassess when new evidence emerges. The rest is easy.