Epsteins Death: Fetishisation, Drama and Evidence.

Most of the people I know festishising about Jefferey Epstein's death have very little to say of any use to Survivors.

Most have never engaged with current writings on trauma, on learned behaviour, inter-generational behaviour patterning, the psychology of hiearically violent cultures, the psychology of egalitarina cultures, the biology of behaviour...

None have taken any action to support Survivors even though the Survivors have been bringing cases and witness testimony to the public domain for decades, and bringing proven offenders to justice.

No.

It seems to me that people prefer their 'beliefs', their fetishes, their drama and their wilful ignorances over the hard, courageous work of Survivors.

We all had so much to say about Jimmy Savile, and yet nothing of the Survivors.

What support did the Conspiracy Freaks offer Survivors?

Where were the go-fund-me crowd funding to support their legal teams?

Where were the marches for Justice when men and women were taking the Vatican to court?

Where are the writers writing about cultural abuse dynamics, with a view to examining this culture and it's abuse dynamic, honestly?

Who truly supports Survivors of Sexual Abuse by going to the Survivors and asking, in all humility, "What can we do to help you?"

None of us would know anything of Epsteins activities if it were not for the courage of Survivors..

Courage to speak truth to power, honestly, fearlessly even though they were petrified...

None of us would know anything of what went on in elite Catholic boarding schools, and many forms of institutional residential care systems worldwide were it not for the Survivors who took direct action, via the courts...

Support Survivors in their work, please.

Do not fall for the drama, the feverish drama, the speculation.

If you don't know enough to understand the problems, then please, be humble enough to learn.

Kindest regards

Corneilius

"Do what you love, it's Your Gift to Universe"

Thank you for reading this blog. All we need to do is be really honest, responsive to the evidence we find,and ready to reassess when new evidence emerges. The rest is easy.

Political Grooming Gangs and Racism - Taboo must be broken.

Political Grooming : Racist ideology in the Americas was carefully groomed, via pulpit, pamhplet and legislaltive action. 1640- 1690s, a four decade program...

The rulers/owners used the Biblical story of the tribe of ham to suggest Africans were descendent from Ham, a son of Noah.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ham_(son_of_Noah)

They suggested that Africans could be Christianised, and saved, even in Slavery, (Slavery as a way of saving them from Hell.)

Native peoples were Heathens, and already damned to Hell and could not be Christianised...so they could be killed and their lands taken.

in addition the Puritan Economy - Wealth reveas Gods favour, poverty was God's disfavour and the fault of the poor, who could, if they tried hard enough, win God's favour, by working hard for the wealthy....

thus a Christian societal hierarchy was institutionalisd, that ran Rich White, Middle class white, artisan class white, menial labour white, indentured workers, criminals, black folk. native peoples..

They did this to ensure that none of the oppressed would seek solidarity with each other...

political grooming gangs. TABOO SUBJECT>

Kindest regards

Corneilius

"Do what you love, it's Your Gift to Universe"

Thank you for reading this blog. All we need to do is be really honest, responsive to the evidence we find,and ready to reassess when new evidence emerges. The rest is easy.

Letter to Editors - Political Grooming Gangs

To the Editor

Sir/Madam

.
Organised, well funded media communications operations that  target and manipulate peoples social woundednesses, their insecurities, prejudices and fears through public, social and private media, through marketing, and propaganda, and through lobby campaigns operating on an industrial scale:  in essence manipulating vulnerable people for ideological, religious, political or economic exploitation.

It is appalling behaviour.

It is abuse.

If one were to behave that way within a relationship, it would be considered utterly abusive.

It is not new. Edward Bernays has a lot to answer for.

What is new is that we have a much more detailed knowledge of how this works, a detailed personal, paper and money trail.

Let's be real here - let us be calling out the behaviour of these political grooming gangsters.

And let us not take the easy route of blaming social media - seek out the people and companies who design these targetted campaigns, and demand they account for their abusive behaviour.

The media can do without their business.

The people can do without being triggered and manipulated.

Our politics can be cleaner, honest and worthy.

Kindest Regards

Corneilius Crowley

Kindest regards

Corneilius

"Do what you love, it's Your Gift to Universe"

Thank you for reading this blog. All we need to do is be really honest, responsive to the evidence we find,and ready to reassess when new evidence emerges. The rest is easy.

Trauma, Trump, Brexit, Iraq and Recovery

 It's not a matter of Left vs Right, it is a question of Institutionalised vs Humanised.

"The study of psychological trauma has a curious history - one of episodic amnesia. Periods of active investigation have alternated with periods of oblivion. Repeatedly in the last century, similar lines of inquiry have been taken up and abruptly abandoned, only to be rediscovered much later. Classic documents of 50 or 100 years ago often read like contemporary works. Though the field has in fact an abundant and rich tradition, it has been periodically forgotten and must be periodically reclaimed.

This intermittent amnesia is not the result of ordinary changes in fashion that affect anyintellectual pursuit. The study of psychological trauma does not languish for lack of interest. Rather, the subject provokes such intense controversy that it periodically becomes anathema. The study of trauma has repeatedly led into the realms of the unthinkable and foundered on fundamental questionsd of belief.

To study psychological trauma is to come face to face with human vulnerability in the natural world and with the capacity for evil in human nature (behaviour). To study psychological trauma is to bearing witness to horrible events.

When events are natural disasters or 'acts of God' those who bear witness sympathise readily with the victim. But when traumatic events are of human design, those who bear witness are caught in the conflict between victim(ised) and perpetrator. It is morally impossible to remain neutral in this conflict. The bystander is forced to take sides.

It is very tempting to take the side of the perpetrator. All the perpetrator asks is that the bystander do nothing. The perpetrator appeals to the universal desire to see, hear and speak no evil. The victimised, on the contrary, asks the bystander to share the burden of pain. The victim(ised) deamnds action, engagement, remembering.

Leo Eitinger, a psychiatrist who has studied survivors of Nazi concentration camps, describes the cruel conflict of interest between victim(ised) and bystander: "War and victims are something the community wants to forget; a veil of oblivion is drawn of everything painful and unpleasant."

In order to escape accountability for crimes, the perpetrators do everything in their powerameThe study of psychological trauma has a curious history - one of episodic amnesia. Periods of active investigation have alternated with periods of oblivion. Repeatedly in the last century, similar lines of inquiry have been taken up and abruptly abandoned, only to be rediscovered much later. Classic documents of 50 or 100 years ago often read like contemporary works. Though the field has in fact an abundant and rich tradition, it has been periodically forgotten and must be periodically reclaimed.

This intermittent amnesia is not the result of ordinary changes in fashion that affect anyintellectual pursuit. The study of psychological trauma does not languish for lack of interest. Rather, the subject provokes such intense controversy that it periodically becomes anathema. The study of trauma has repeatedly led into the realms of the unthinkable and foundered on fundamental questionsd of belief.

To study psychological trauma is to come face to face with human vulnerability in the natural world and with the capacity for evil in human nature (behaviour). To study psychological trauma is to bearing witness to horrible events.

When events are natural disasters or 'acts of God' those who bear witness sympathise readily with the victim. But when traumatic events are of human design, those who bear witness are caught in the conflict between victim(ised) and perpetrator. It is morally impossible to remain neutral in this conflict. The bystander is forced to take sides.

It is very tempting to take the side of the perpetrator. All the perpetrator asks is that the bystander do nothing. The perpetrator appeals to the universal desire to see, hear and speak no evil. The victimised, on the contrary, asks the bystander to share the burden of pain. The victim(ised) deamnds action, engagement, remembering.

Leo Eitinger, a psychiatrist who has studied survivors of Nazi concentration camps, describes the cruel conflict of interest between victim(ised) and bystander: "War and victims are something the community wants to forget; a veil of oblivion is drawn of everything painful and unpleasant....."

 In order to escape accountability for crimes,the perpetrators do everything in their power to promote forgetting. Secrecy and silence are the perpetrators first line of defence. If secrecy fails the perpetrator attacks the credibility of the victimised who speak out. If that fails, the perpetrator tries to make sure no one listens.

After every atroicity one can expect to hear the same predictable apologies; it never happened; the victim lies; the victim exagerrates; the victim brought it upon themselves; and in any case it is time to forget the past and move on.

------

These are the opening pages of Trauma and Recovery by Judith Herman

-----

In the UK, with regards to the Invasion of Iraq these words ring out as a clarion call above and beyond the petty concerns of Brexit; they also ring out to remind us all that Austerity kills vulnerable people and that we bystanders, all taxpayers, each and everyone of us, without exception, have a role to play in confronting both of these atrocities, and many more and we have a role in preventing future atrocities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court_Act_2001

We cannot compare the deaths of tens of thousands of vulnerable people induced by deliberate chronic economic distress with the destruction of an entire countries civil infrastructure and a war that killed a million people, maimed many moreand orphaned 4 million children.

We can draw parrallels, because the atrocious behaviour of powerful interests is in direct conflict with the needs of ordinary people and at the same time ordinary people, as bystanders are disempowered and urged to do nothing to undermine those powerful interests.

The British public are permitted and encouraged to to protest fracking, CO2 in the atmosphere yet totally inhibited when it comes to prosecutions of War Crimes (Iraq) and Crimes against Humanity (UN report on the rights of disabled people in the UK).

Racism, human progress vs evolution and adaptation.

Racism is always top down...

The origins of Cultural, Scientific Racism and Legal Racism are with the elites, the intellectual classes, the ruling oligarchy, who taught, promoted and legislated (legalised) racism reinforcing it through applied trauma and reward, thus normalising and institutionalising the practices of Racism.

Racism has never emerged from the grass roots.

Trump, and others like him who represent Power (and who is himself a traumatised child-adult) say things in public that encourages ordinary folk who are racists by social conditioning and learning (and who are powerless by comparison, and who feel that disempowerment and are frustrated by it) to 'come out', and they do, so that they too can feel powerful, superior... and can assuage the pain of their own powerlessness.

The majority of grass roots 'racists' are groomed into that way of thinking and feeling, precisely because they can be triggered to assault other grass roots people.

50 years ago, this week the US Government passed laws banning seregation.
However, they did not teach honest histories in school to show the people how the colonial british invented Race, using the Bible, the pulpit, pamhplets, broadsheets and then Institutionalised Racism as a means to ensure the working poor, the slaves and the native peoples would not rise to defeat their oppressors but would fight with each other for their place in the hierarchy...

Laws are never enough, they can easily be broken, therefore honesty in education is critical for prevention.

Hence, until parents demand honesty in education, Racist views will perpetuate to be used by power to divide the people

Australian Aboriginals legally described as Fauna until 1967 - do you understand what that actually means?

The Ruling class defining for everyone the status of the people who are the ancient inhabitants of Australia....

"Animals!"

"Cave Men", "Ug Ug".

These are terms I hear from 'well educated' people all the time....

They have been educated to describe ancient egalitarian peoples in that way as part of a trajectory of progress and evolution that leads to the current dominant culture of industrialised militarised power and technology as being the apex of evolutionary progress. with a bright future in the stars....

No. That is a lie.

I am a biological orgnaism, and I am ancient design: to be co-operative, happy, loving, empathic, robustly healthy as part of a social community that is fully part of the habitat..

There is no need for further 'evolution' or progress in this regard..

Does an Elephant herd need to 'evolve' further, to progress to become better Elephants?

Do Trees and Fungi need to 'improve' themselves?

No.

Evolution has nothing to do with 'progress' - evolution is about responding to a dynamic environment....

Industrial Culture is a disease state, a rape of life itself.

Which is why fighting for survival does not work, even though resistance is a natural response, it cannot win. The struggle for survival is not a biological reality, it is a social construct of all hierarchically violent cultures.

The Industrial Rapist will not stop, and it is only the Citizens of the Industrial Culture who could stop that culture from the act of raping the Earth's habitats - if we understood, if we have the courage, solidarity and empathy to live that understanding.

This is why I write.

Who will stop Bolsanaro and the Evangelical Movement tied into the Oligarchy?

Who will stop British Weapons makers from supplying Saudi War planes so that they can continue to bomb Yemeni civilians?

Who will stop the British and American States from funding violent militia?

Who will stop Boris Johnson spending £100 million of Tax payers funds on a marketing campaign - grooming that part of the electorate that are susceptible to being groomed via their vulnerabilities, triggering that part that can be enraged, just to divide and conquer?

Who?

The Healers.

Courage rather than fear.

Knowledge rather than belief.

Recovery rather than progress.

This is hard work, it is terrifying work, and yet what alternative is there?

For me, none.

For many others a whole host of reasons determine whether we act or not.

Kindest regards

Corneilius

"Do what you love, it's Your Gift to Universe"

Thank you for reading this blog. All we need to do is be really honest, responsive to the evidence we find,and ready to reassess when new evidence emerges. The rest is easy.

The Great Hack - a critical analysis

The Great Hack.

I just watched 'The Great Hack' on Netflix.

I watched it twice, just to make sure I was clear on what it was...

It was not about a hack at all.

Hacking is gaining unauthorised access to a prohibited computer system and injecting novel code into it to play with it, extract information, undermine it etc...

Cambridge Analytica is not a hacking operation. Though it has been associated with hacking in the Nigerian Elections in 2015. Hacking the emails of the Nigerian President. Not that that was mentioned in this 'documentary'. Not enough time, really. There's a lot in this documentary.

The narrative presented in 'The Great Hack' was carefully designed to avoid the simple truth that all mainstream news that carries advertising, are also being utilised as political grooming devices and that many are actively aware of that and unwilling to do anything reasonable about it.

The Sun, Telegraph and the Daily Mail, the Guardian, the Independent and the Mirror...they all carry propaganda posing as news.

The narrative in The Hack was also to seek to blame Facebook, and the Tech companies, rather than talk about political grooming, seriously.

In essence a deflection 

Another way to say it this : no one talked intelligently about political grooming.
 
As a cultural and politically institutionalised dynamic of abuse carried out in the public domain, a form of bullying, that is the mainstay of advertising, marketing, religious indoctrination and propaganda.

Jeremy Corbyn is not an anti-semite, racist, terrorist supporting politican; he is exactly the opposite.
 
The press bullying of him, and his strength of character, are an object lesson in how to deal with public bullies.

Here's my take on the 'documentary'...
 
Ms. Kaiser is no whistle blower...
 
Ms Kaiser worked for the Obama Election campaign, a proven grooming operation - I said so at the time, even without understanding the way targetting was being weaponised by groups such as Cambridge Analytica, because I was paying attention to the funding drives on facebook, and to the mainstream print and broadcast campaigns. And because it's been the basic dynamic of neoliberal 'democracy' for a long time...

Ms. Kaiser was involved in  the 2015 Nigerian Election campaign, where she introduced a team of Israeli specialists to the Cambridge Analytica team,  who had hacked the incumbent Nigerian President's emails...

Cambridge Analytica ran campaigns for right wing candidates in a number of third world countries, to earn a few bob and to prove the fficacy of the model, before going on to the really big bucks.

Trumps Election 2016 campaign spent just under one hundred million US dollars on their facebook messaging.
 
Ms. Kaiser worked on Trump's campaign at the very core of it's Facebook operations,  . fully aware of what she was doing. She was at the very center of this. She knew they were targetting peoples biases, fears, insecurities and prejudice in order to exploit those for political gain.

Her role as the protagonist in 'The Great Hack' was to elicit sympathy in the horrified viewer, and thus by appearing to be apologetic, remorseful,  concerned, worried, anxious, etc  to deflect attention away from the core criminal behaviour she participated in.

The term for this activity is grooming. Taboo to say this outloud. "shhhhhhhshshs!"
Ms, Kaiser mentioned the use of weaponised communications tactics, which are apparently restricted by the Department of Defence.
 
This was complimented by Carole Cadwalladr's effort to shift the blame to Facebook and the Tech companies.

Included in the 'documentary' was two brief sections covering Alexander Nix, the CEO of CA.

His boasting at a dinner meeting about CA's abilities, and his recalcitrant appearance before the House of Commons Committe Hearings on Fake News, where he got off very lightly.

CA was shut down due to bankruptcy, - such a difficult decision to make, and so much money already banked..... and unfortunately the bulk of their files went missing, or were destroyed, lost, etc...  so there's a hole in the evidence set.


Well, well, well.

If you wish to check the nature of the Observer and The Guardian take a peek at Medialens (.org) a UK based news media analysis website which has, since 2001, confronted the propaganda that gets passed off as 'news reporting' - in effect misleading readerships in line with political hegemons, or as I would call it, the grooming of ordinary folk via opinion posing as evidence (WMD) in the UK media - by directly questioning the reports, the reporters, their claims and data.

Chomksy called that process of propaganda the manufacturing of consent.

www.medialens.org is well worth a look.

Read the mainstream, then go to medialens and check....

The Great Hack

I found The Great Hack initially interesting, then tedius, I realised that it was empty and ultimately dishonest. That said everyone ought to watch it, and note how they are being mislead... learning by experience.

It also tried to pass off Russian influence on UK voting as a major influential factor, which is just untrue. All competing powers brief against their perceived opponents, through various media outlets. That is standard practice, and no great secret or conspiracy. It rarely has any meanungful effect upon the target populations...

The major malign influences are always homegrown.

The Great Hack is deeply dishonest, ( I repeat myself, here) but unless you know something about grooming, you'd never twig it.

In this previous posting, I outlined in the most precise and concise terms, the true nature of political grooming gangs.

https://dwylcorneilius.blogspot.com/2019/01/political-grooming-gangs-you-should-be.html?m=1
 

Let's have a laugh!

Boris Johnson's £10 million grooming operation will go nowhere near his hair or his crumpled suits...

and

"You've been Groomed!"

New Reality Show Pitch.

'Enjoy the thrills and spills of indoctrinators, indoctrination and the indoctrinated as our intrepid reporter takes you on a journey of discovery, breakdown and release."

pitched to ITV, BBC, CNN etc...

all rejected it as 'improbable'.

subtext - are you trying to kill us off.

( yes, of course, you are grooming gangsters!)

No, i did not pitch this, this is all make believe fake news...

--Here's a track I created to articulate the realities of political and ideological grooming.

https://soundcloud.com/coreluminous/we-know-how-to-groom-you

Kindest regards

Corneilius

"Do what you love, it's Your Gift to Universe"

Thank you for reading this blog. All we need to do is be really honest, responsive to the evidence we find,and ready to reassess when new evidence emerges. The rest is easy.