The Zionist Colony is a Weapon.
The Israeli colony was designed by the British Empire Ruling Class as a weapon aimed at prevent pan-Arab political and economic solidarity. The subdivision of the region was designed to set up Monarchies and Dictatorships that would keep political and economic Power from the people, and act as vassal states of the European Empires, funded, trained and armed by the European Empires.
The political movements within the new states that attempted to implement independence from the European yoke were undermined through covert and overt warfare, instigated from Europe.
The long term geo-strategic objective was and remains to prevent non-European States developing independent economies utilising the resources of their regions to build industrial modern socialist societies, because the Europeans, well aware of the exploitative nature of their own economies feared the well known collaborative and pro-social proclivities and the creativity of the global south would soon outpace the Europeans and importantly reveal to the European populations the fundamental flaws of European Capital as a hegemonic power.
The underlying element of British and European Racism as a tool of Wealth Extraction.
Palestinian-American intellectual and activist Edward Said wrote about this in his work, Orientalism. It is an essential read.
His 1978 book of the same name explores the ways Western experts, or “Orientalists”, have come to understand and represent the Middle East, drawing on the long history of European Empires forays into Africa and Western and South Eastern Asia..
Said shows how Orientalist writings and ideologies actively shape the world they describe, and how they perpetuate views of Middle Eastern and the peoples of the Global South people as inferior, subservient, and in need of saving. As a result, these often racist or romanticised stereotypes create a worldview that was promoted to justify Western colonialism and imperialism.
The European Rulers and Capitalists were well aware that these views were wildly inaccurate - however they needed their populations to think otherwise in order to get away with the criminal cruelty that they knew well they intended to inflict, in order to extract wealth from those regions.
I remember in my youth watching the movie 'Fu Man Chu' which gave me a dread of the Chinese. It was, I later understood, a work of propaganda.
Fu Manchu is the fictional supervillain created by Sax Rohmer in 1913, acting as the ultimate personification of the "Yellow Peril". The character’s propaganda was built on racist paranoia, feeding Western anxieties about Asian influence, and framing Chinese people as a mysterious, existential threat to Western civilization.
Grooming as a political weapon.
People in power do not have to be Racist themselves to be willing to deploy Racism as a political weapon, and this makes them so much more dangerous than the ordinary street level bigot. Those who curate any form of bigotry to weaponise a population are among the most dangerous people on Earth.
The story of the invention of the category 'White People' by the oligarchy that Ruled in the British Colonies on Turtle Island is instructive. The intent was to weaponise one sector of a diverse working population, Europeans, against all others.
With regard to Orinetlaism the European Ruling Class Oligarchy who had relations with the ruling class of the global south, and understood them quite well enough to trade with and collaborate with as they expanded their colonial dominance needed the ordinary working Europeans to believe that they too were superior to 'the natives' of exotic lands, they need the ordinary Europeans to buy the sales rap of bringing civilisation, christianity and commerce to the rest of the world, and they need willing applicants to man the armies of bureaucrats, technicians, workers, police and military mercenaries they had to utilise to dominate and protect the exploitation of those exotic regions.
The Global South vs Individualistic Capital
To this day European power limits Global South development primarily through asymmetrical economic and institutional structures. Mechanisms like unequal trade rules, restrictive intellectual property, debt burdens, and unilateral environmental policies—such as the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)—reinforce dependency and hinder domestic industrialization.
Undermining any state that attempts to correct this imbalance is standard European Foreign Policy.
Deprivation in Britain is a weapon.
Furthermore in Britain the processes of extraction of wealth and its engineers have consistently corrupted Government to maintain a level of poverty to drive a large swathe of the people into low wage work, because cheap labour is a major wealth extraction amplifier.
This also generates a sector of the population who are genuinely facing deprivation, generation after generation, who see a middle class and a billionaire class gaining wealth whilst they suffer.
In entertainment they see themselves being caricatured and castigated - Little Britain, Benefits Street, Shameless, 'Shirkers and Strivers' narratives.
They see Working Tax Credits and Universal Credit deployed to subsidise low wages, rather than improve their lives, they see corruption in politics as Wealth donates to influence politicians, they endure unequal educational provision, they suffer from the removal of stable social housing, they are well aware that wages have been kept artificially low.
An ocean of human suffering, routinely belittled.
Of course they are angry.
And the madness that their anger is being deflected via the dynamics of deployed lateral violence, away from the Ruling Class, towards 'othered' groups of people who are visually easy to identify, is also a cruelty. Starmer's island of strangers was an act of utter cruelty. And the way their
anger is being exacerbated to heighten their emotional reactivity and to weaponise them against their own interests is yet another layer of intentional cruelty.
Who occupies Britian?
If it is that Britain is occupied, it is that it is the British Ruling Class who are the descendants of the Normans, the Monarchy, the Barons and the landed aristocracy who organised the expansion of colonialism as a business model to build the wealth to create Capitalism itself. The Normans came to Britain on boats, carrying big knives.
The Two Problems of People and Power.
The problem the British people face is the majority have never ever held their Ruling Class accountable for the many avoidable harms it has caused them and so many others. And so they are Ruled over rather than governed well.
The problem the British Ruling Class face is that this is shifting - a growing majority understand that they have to dismantle the old sordid venal ruling class, in part because their wilful enabling of the Genocide of Palestinians is now blatant and unapologetic.
The Labour Party started as workers and socialists seeking to wrangle a better deal without a direct confrontation, because they did not want another Civil War where modern weapons would be deployed. There was wisdom in that slower approach.
However, after WWI, The Labour Party was infiltrated by The Establishment, who have been weakening the advocacy of ordinary working people within the Labour movement.
It no longer serves any purpose other than to maintain the dominance of the English Ruling Class.
Reform serves the English Ruling Class as a method of dividing the population against itself and its own interests.
Who then can the British people turn to other than each other, in solidarity, and who among the political movements best represents the meeting of this need?