If Britain is occupied, who are the occupiers?

The Zionist Colony is a Weapon.

The Israeli colony was designed by the British Empire Ruling Class as a weapon aimed at prevent pan-Arab political and economic solidarity. The subdivision of the region was designed to set up Monarchies and Dictatorships that would keep political and economic Power from the people, and act as vassal states of the European Empires, funded, trained and armed by the European Empires. 

The political movements within the new states that attempted to implement independence from the European yoke were undermined through covert and overt warfare, instigated from Europe.

The long term geo-strategic objective was and remains to prevent non-European States developing independent economies utilising the resources of their regions to build industrial modern socialist societies, because the Europeans, well aware of the exploitative nature of their own economies feared the well known collaborative and pro-social proclivities and the creativity of the global south would soon outpace the Europeans and importantly reveal to the European populations the fundamental flaws of European Capital as a hegemonic power.

The underlying element of British and European Racism as a tool of Wealth Extraction.

Palestinian-American intellectual and activist Edward Said wrote about this in his work,  Orientalism. It is an essential read.

His 1978 book of the same name explores the ways Western experts, or “Orientalists”, have come to understand and represent the Middle East, drawing on the long history of European Empires forays into Africa and Western and South Eastern Asia.. 

Said shows how Orientalist writings and ideologies actively shape the world they describe, and how they perpetuate views of Middle Eastern and the peoples of the Global South people as inferior, subservient, and in need of saving. As a result, these often racist or romanticised stereotypes create a worldview that was promoted to justify Western colonialism and imperialism.

The European Rulers and Capitalists were well aware that these views were wildly inaccurate - however they needed their populations to think otherwise in order to get away with the criminal cruelty that they knew well they intended to inflict, in order to extract wealth from those regions. 

I remember in my youth watching the movie 'Fu Man Chu' which gave me a dread of the Chinese. It was, I later understood, a work of propaganda. 

Fu Manchu is the fictional supervillain created by Sax Rohmer in 1913, acting as the ultimate personification of the "Yellow Peril". The character’s propaganda was built on racist paranoia, feeding Western anxieties about Asian influence, and framing Chinese people as a mysterious, existential threat to Western civilization.

Grooming as a political weapon.

People in power do not have to be Racist themselves to be willing to deploy Racism as a political weapon, and this makes them so much more dangerous than the ordinary street level bigot. Those who curate any form of bigotry to weaponise a population are among the most dangerous people on Earth.

The story of the invention of the category 'White People' by the oligarchy that Ruled in the British Colonies on Turtle Island is instructive. The intent was to weaponise one sector of a diverse working population, Europeans, against all others.

With regard to Orinetlaism the European Ruling Class Oligarchy who had relations with the ruling class of the global south, and understood them quite well enough to trade with and collaborate with as they expanded their colonial dominance needed the ordinary working Europeans to believe that they too were superior to 'the natives' of exotic lands, they need the ordinary Europeans to buy the sales rap of bringing civilisation, christianity and commerce to the rest of the world, and they need willing applicants to man the armies of bureaucrats, technicians, workers, police and military mercenaries they had to utilise to dominate and protect the exploitation of those exotic regions. 

The Global South vs Individualistic Capital

To this day European power limits Global South development primarily through asymmetrical economic and institutional structures. Mechanisms like unequal trade rules, restrictive intellectual property, debt burdens, and unilateral environmental policies—such as the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)—reinforce dependency and hinder domestic industrialization.

Undermining any state that attempts to correct this imbalance is standard European Foreign Policy.

Deprivation in Britain is a weapon.

Furthermore in Britain the processes of extraction of wealth and its engineers have  consistently corrupted Government to maintain a level of poverty to drive a large swathe of the people into low wage work, because cheap labour is a major wealth extraction amplifier. 

This also generates a sector of the population who are genuinely facing deprivation, generation after generation, who see a middle class and a billionaire class gaining wealth whilst they suffer. 

In entertainment they see themselves being caricatured and castigated - Little Britain, Benefits Street, Shameless, 'Shirkers and Strivers' narratives. 

They see Working Tax Credits and Universal Credit deployed to subsidise low wages, rather than improve their lives, they see corruption in politics as Wealth donates to influence politicians, they endure unequal educational provision, they suffer from the removal of stable social housing, they are well aware that wages have been kept artificially low.

And we have evidence that all of this suffering is intentionally imposed, and yet the comfortable middle class appear to be refusing to stand in solidarity with the people facing such deprivation.

An ocean of human suffering, routinely belittled.

Of course they are angry. 

And the madness that their anger is being deflected via the dynamics of deployed lateral violence, away from the Ruling Class, towards 'othered' groups of people who are visually easy to identify, is also a cruelty. Starmer's island of strangers was an act of utter cruelty. And the way their anger is being exacerbated to heighten their emotional reactivity and to weaponise them against their own interests is yet another layer of intentional cruelty.

Who occupies Britian?

If it is that Britain is occupied, it is that it is the British Ruling Class who are the descendants of the Normans, the Monarchy, the Barons and the landed aristocracy who organised the expansion of colonialism as a business model to build the wealth to create Capitalism itself. The Normans came to Britain on boats, carrying big knives.

The Two Problems of People and Power.

The problem the British people face is the majority have never ever held their Ruling Class accountable for the many avoidable harms it has caused them and so many others. And so they are Ruled over rather than governed well.

The problem the British Ruling Class face is that this is shifting - a growing majority understand that they have to dismantle the old sordid venal ruling class, in part because their wilful enabling of the Genocide of Palestinians is now blatant and unapologetic.

The Labour Party started as workers and socialists seeking to wrangle a better deal without a direct confrontation, because they did not want another Civil War where modern weapons would be deployed. There was wisdom in that slower approach.

However, after WWI, The Labour Party was infiltrated by The Establishment, who have been weakening the advocacy of ordinary working people within the Labour movement.

It no longer serves any purpose other than to maintain the dominance of the English Ruling Class.

Reform serves the English Ruling Class as a method of dividing the population against itself and its own interests.

Who then can the British people turn to other than each other, in solidarity, and who among the political movements best represents the meeting of this need?

Kindest regards

Corneilius

Thank you for reading this blog.

"Do what you love, it is your gift to universe."

This blog, like all my other content creation work is not monetised via advertising. If you like what I present, consider sharing my content. If you can afford the price of a cup of coffee or a pint of beer/ale/cider for a few months, please donate via my Patreon account.

https://patreon.com/corneilius - donations gratefully received

https://www.reverbnation.com/corneilius - .mp3 songs

https://www.soundcloud.com/coreluminous - .wav Songs

https://www.corneilius.net - Archive

#folkmusic

#singersongwriter

#blogger

#music

Radical Talking Points - you will not like this much. Unless you do.

".

Violence and the trauma it causes cannot be treated without also treating the setting within which violence has occurred. It is not just about the individual and the assailant, it is also about the culture.

"The study of trauma is an inherently political exercise in that it brings attention to the experience of the oppressed." Judith Herman, writing about trauma and the aftermath, from domestic violence to state terror.

It is quite clear that the culture not as safe as it could be. What I mean is that the UN Declaration of Human Rights is a ratified treaty incorporated in to statute Law in a majority of States.

The meaning of the UNDHR is that part of resolving population level trauma is making the culture we live in a much safer culture than it is. Making an effort.

Arresting Derek Chauvin, and putting him on trial as a lone individual whilst ignoring the culture within which he lived and operated is inadequate to the task of addressing the issue of police violence and the issue of Racism, two issues that are intertwined in American policing and American culture and it's history.

Racism was invented. Misogyny was invented. Neither of these are naturally emergent behavioural characteristics. Some people claim that 'othering' is a natural enough behaviour. Their evidence is flimsy. Just because it can happen does not imply that it is naturally emergent.

Statistics do not tell the full story. Less people die as a result of lynching by an angry racist mob, whipped up locally in a fever of hatred and rage than in previous times, nonetheless Racism persists, the teachings of White Supremacy remain active, and there is no attempt made to counter that at it's root and so, for many people whose skin is dark, whose ancestral and ethnic roots are African, Racism today has a traumatic impact upon their lives.

That same can be said of Misogyny. 

To be a political radical is to look at the very roots of any subject and from there start to confront it's inequities from their origins, with as much honesty and clarity as one can gather. Blowing up a bridge or a parliament is not inherently radical  - indeed both actions are a continuation of the cycles of violence inherent in a violent hierarchy culture, and thus they are, to my mind at least,  the opposite to radical.  

They are not looking at the roots of violence in order to resolve the behaviours of violence. Jihadi's are not radical at all. White Supremacists are not radical. Both the Jihadist and White Supremacist deliberately avoid the roots of the problems of the world.  Political English is replete with misused language. Radicalisation? It is indoctrination, it is political grooming. It is not radicalisation. 

Racism.

It is the task of white people who understand the meaning, the history of systemic and personal Racism to confront it, to challenge it and to dismantle it among other white people.  This is not a task for the targets of Racism alone. Personal Racism is not a personal flaw. It is the internalisation of a weapons system thought form. Racism was invented. Racism had a purpose. To counter than, to in-invent it demands that we are honest as to how and why Racism was invented.

Racism was invented to protect the interests of a violent hierarchy - the plantation owners and the rulers of colonial America, while it was still a British colony and it's citizens British subjects. The Plantation owners were a minority who faced a majority they oppressed - indentured European and African workers, and the indigenous peoples. Racism was invented to set the European indentured workers as superior humans to the Africans, and the native peoples, and to set them as antagonists, one against the other.

At the time there was a substantial indentured worker population from Africa. British Privateers had been raiding Spanish Slavers for decades, capturing the enslaved Africans as booty, bringing them to the colonies, where they were indentured as workers. There was also some movement of free Africans who took up indentured work by choice. There was therefore significant population of free Africans who had worked their indentures and were considered citizens. There was a significant inter marriage between European and African, and a significant demographic of African farmers, artisans and other trades.

The creation of the legal category White Race, or White People, in 1681, was a critical step in that process. There is no such thing in biology, morality or historical precedent where skin colour denoted superiority or inferiority that was legalised.  It is a cultural definition. designed by an oppressor class to incite lateral violence among those they oppressed.

Then slowly bit by bit the Oligarchs passed laws limiting African's freedoms and rights, even banning inter marriage between Europeans and Africans. Slavery was introduced on the back of these new laws.

That is British and American History.

Misogyny.

It's the task of men who understand the meaning and history of systemic and personal  Misogyny to confront it, to challenge it and to dismantle it among other men. This is not a task for women alone.  Personal Misogyny is not a personal flaw. It is the internalisation of a weapons system thought form.

Misogyny is invented as part of a cultural belief set of Patriarchy. The anger of misogyny is that women do not submit. Patriarchy held that women were the chattels of men, that women should submit to the whims of men, that women were tools of patrilineal inheritance, breeders of dynasty. Greek Democracy was rooted in Patriarchy. The British Empire likewise. The American Constitution was a document drawn up by and for men of property.

System approved Feminism runs like this - if you are willing to operate the existing power system as it stands, as one of us, you are welcome. Join us. We call this 'equality'.

Genuine Feminism: we see and understand the violent hierarchy cult and we see it's inequity and we will, holding hands with one another, men and women, dismantle that violent hierarchy. we call this equity, justice, peace more than the absence of war.

Poverty.

It's the task of working class, middle class and wealthy people who understand poverty as imposed, as a structural pillar of the violent hierarchy system, to confront it, to challenge it and to dismantle all support for it among other working class, middle class and wealthy  people. And then to organise together to abolish poverty. This is not a task for the impoverished.  Personal poverty or hatred of the poor are not personal flaws. They are the internalisations of a weapons system thought form.

Wealth is God smiling on you, poverty is His disfavour. That is a lie.

Peace

It's the task of working class, middle class and wealthy people who understand that war is tool of a violent hierarchy, that it is imposed, structurally, and that our task is to confront war mongers, to challenge them at every turn and to dismantle the systemic use of war as a tool of a violent power, where ever we find it, starting with our immediate, local and national Governments.

Monarchy, Aristocracy, Rulers.

Monarchy is an evil. Monarchy is an invention. Monarchy is the original knife crime syndicate. The 'Stablishment. The history of Kings and Queens is a bloody mess.

Abolish Monarchy, abolish all titles. Remove all privileges. Hand the land and wealth back to the people from whom it was taken, as it was always taken at the point of a blade. Let the concept of a noble class fade into the mists. We are all noble, if any one is.

I say this and I say too that  we must not make the error of personalising this. 

It is not about the person who is Queen, it is not about the individual Lord, Lady or Prince, Duke or Earl - it's not about them as people, since mostly they are people trapped by accident of birth. They did not choose their parents. They were born into that position. .

It is about the institution and the systems of Hierarchy,  Power and Violence. 

The whole edifice of Monarchy is deeply rooted in Violent Abuse.

To praise or celebrate monarchs of the past is similar to praising or celebrating Jimmy Savile, after it has been disclosed he is a sexual predator, on the basis of his charity work. Henry the 8th was a psycho. most of the Kings and Queens have been dysfunctional, violent and abusive characters. Goes with the territory, I reckon.

"The knights were robbers, the Kings were crooks, see through the lies of our History books."

Monarchy is the original knife crime syndicate.

The Stablishment.

Monarchy is the original knife crime syndicate.

Stab you front, stab you back, stab you left, stab you right, stab you waking, stab you sleeping, in the night. Stab, stab, 'Stablishment. Just look at the history. Just look at the myriad movies that have celebrity actors cast as the Kings and Queens, and look at how the movies draw a veil over the psychopathy of monarchy.

Political Grooming Gangs undermine everybody's Freedom and Liberty by pretending to stand for Freedom and Liberty. They ask you to fight for Queen and Country, They ask you to fight for God and Country.

Monarchs play the same gambit. 

Kindest regards

Corneilius

"Do what you love, it is your gift to universe."