Showing posts with label Justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Justice. Show all posts

Adversarial Politics is not our friend.


Adversarial Politics is not our friend.

Brian Bilston, Poet


Assassination attempts are always psychopathy.


There is something deeply, profoundly unhealthy in terms of mental health and behaviour behaviour of people in the USA, across the political domain. 


One cannot take any comfort from political violence. In that moment Mr. Trump was victimised. As was the person who died from a head wound, and the two people who received non-lethal wounds, and to a certain extent, the gunman. A 22 year old, barely an adult. What did he learn that drove him to take such an action? 


What happened to infant Trump. What did he learn, and from whom? What influenced his development, behaviour and character? 


What is either person symptomatic of?  


Nothing can justify such action, nothing, we do not need to make an excuse for either party - and we must try to understand. We must.


A problem correctly understood is half way towards a solution. A problem incorrectly understood is insoluble.

This is a soluble problem.


The adversarial dynamic is not the friend of the people at large. 


The adversarial dynamic tends to empower predatory behaviour rather than prevent predatory behaviour. It enables bullying as a tactic and a behavioural problem becomes an institutional and cultural problem. 


What is truly worrying is that it is intentional and incidental. The adversarial approach seems to incite chosen groups to engage in violence with 'othered' groups, driving ordinary apart.


There's no value in speculating about these events. We must understand them accurately. What does the evidence suggest?


Othering


"The term Othering or Otherizing describes the reductive action of labelling and defining a person as a subaltern native, as someone who belongs to the socially subordinate category of the Other. 


The practice of Othering excludes persons who do not fit the norm of the social group, which is a version of the Self;  likewise, in human geography, the practice of othering persons means to exclude and displace them from the social group to the margins of society, where mainstream social norms do not apply to them, for being the Other" Source :  Wikipedia 


There is a website that tracks mass shooting events in the United States of America.  It records every known mass shooting updating daily, often with multiple entries for a single day.To shoot other human beings one has to have 'othered' them entirely.


Clearly the United States of America is not a healthy polity. Too much 'othering'.


The USA is a State that operates more than 700 military bases outside its own territory.  In other States territories. A state with declared adversaries, enemies, allies.


A state engaged in warfare, in supplying weapons to allies waging war, even going so far as to enable a genocide. A state where regular mass shooting events occur. Multiple states at war. A pattern. A global cultural institutionalised behavioural dysfunction.


This is not healthy behaviour.

@millyoneire Replying to @badarttangent This BEYOND hypocritical speech @Biden-Harris HQ ♬ We Rise Against (Full) - Jonathan Paulsen

The sickness is systemic, a global culture of adversarial violence and power struggles. 

The consequences of that are horrific. 


Gaza, the home of 2.3 million Palestinians, in ruins.* 

“Suddenly, we heard sound of a missile, and then a very strong explosion,” said Abu Hammad, 36. “Then the sound of screaming, ashes, and blood were the only thing you could hear, see and smell. When I pulled myself together, I remembered that my daughter had been standing near the school’s gate. I ran madly, and screaming her name.”

Abu Hammad started looking for her daughter, stepping between the injured, the dead and the scattered body parts, but could not find her.

“There were many bodies, including children, women, and men, some cut to many pieces, some burnt alive. The street was a pool of blood. But there was no trace of my child.” 

source : The Guardian 


There is much, much worse on Instagram, Twitter, Al Jazeera, Tiktok, Telegram and beyond, with all of these horrors intended by Israeli and seen by USUK air and satellite surveillance systems. The reality is undeniable.

What is that?


Gaza, The Sudan, Ukraine, Congo, Myanmar , Libya, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Kashmir, and so many other places. 


Political violence in the service of Wealth as Power.


The hierarchy of a culture, any culture, can exert an immense influence on the lives of the majority outside the hierarchy circles who must live within the conditions they set. And the hierarchy class can and do often exert that influence with impunity. They are rarely held accountable.


In this case, the case of the USA, the political hierarchy is a well studied and understood malign influence, with lethal consequences for its own populations, and those of many other States. 


America is not alone in this dynamic. It is a global problem. Adversarial dynamics among ruling classes is an ancient reality, alive and well today.


Historically speaking it is true to say that Competing Warring States is the prior geopolitical system, and the inheritance of that line of governance remains hugely problematic, in spite of liberal democracy and its promises. Liberal Democracy emerges form an adversarial dynamic without challenging that adversarial dynamic, which keeps that dynamic in place, and we all suffer for it.


Adversarial Politics is not our friend.

No more left tight tussles, please - it’s exhausting. I know this is not an imminent possibility. It remains a possibility nonetheless.




There you have it, on one easy to understand quote, from Tim Field


Tim Field born 24 April 1952 in Eastbourne 15 January 2006) was a British anti-bullying activist with his main focus relating to workplace bullying. He was the author of two books. In 2011, Field and a journalist Neil Marr coined the term "bullycide"

I tend to see Neoliberalism as just another branding in the historical trend of 'Wealth Extraction as Power Oppressing Nations'. I call this kind of system a Bully Cult. It operates as a bully, imposes beliefs to justify and rationalise the bullying, and it encourages bullying through curating bigotry.


The WEAPON cult which long, long ago created the adversarial system because even within it's constituents, the leading power factions - the Owners, the Kings and Queens, the War Lords, the Barons, the Hedge Funds, The Corporate Owners, The major institutional religions - all engaged in open and covert violent competition, where adversarial approaches were and remain the norm. 


Monarchy the original knife crime syndicate.


It is a behavioural characteristic, a cultural pattern rather than a standard human behaviour. It is also a learned pattern of behaviour. Who teaches that? Who mentors children to become professional bullies adults?

Adversarial Culture is not going to help us.


My humanist political stance points out that the Left/Right dynamics of political ideology are inherently adversarial and that they cannot facilitate Mutual Aid approach to Governance.  


These then are the settings born of adversarial relations and they do not reflect a need to abandon the adversarial model of governance, in order to achieve mutual aid and healthy governance. 


Most users of the terms Left/Right believe the adversarial dynamic is inevitable, natural and that 'it is the way reality works' because it is here, has always been here in recorded history, and it seems to be inevitable. It is not. 


I find at times that for me the terms Left/Right are inadequate to our political needs in these times. They carry malign, curated characteristic attributions, because they have become weaponised. They are used as emotional weapons. Dog whistles for the pain of impotent anger and the regression of revenge.  


Hit back! Hit Back! Destroy them..


Historically the oppositional dynamic and psychologies of Power contained within Left/Right labelling are rooted in old 18th Century categorisations, from the French Revolution, a violent uprising that was presented as a struggle for liberation, which it was in part.


What happened was that pretty soon another violent hierarchy emerged to continue the ancient systemic approach of Wealth Extraction as Power, now represented by the Right,  in opposition to the Left, who represented the ordinary people in general terms, rather than specific. 


Within Marxism, a contradiction is a relationship in which two forces oppose each other, leading to mutual development. It is adversarial.


This pattern of thinking ensures that the hierarchy and its violence persists.


Wealth as Power opposing the People

The term Left was later adopted to meet Marxian analysis, and the rise of Trade Unions as a political lobby protecting workers from Abusive Industrialists. 


The Left was for Workers Rights, The Right was for Owners Power way back then and remains so through to today..

Both sides claim that it is ‘hard working people’ and 'entrepreneurs' and 'honest workers' who they appeal to and who form up their natural support base.  Factories need workers. Wealth Extraction needs workers. Workers towns need shops. Shops need workers. Wealth extraction needs to extract from every level of that. Wealth extraction needs workers.


While they are not the same, or comparable, The Left and The Right, they are bootstrapped by the dominance of the adversarial dynamic of power politics. That dynamic entraps all who participate in it. That is why it is allowed to persist.


That dynamic is a huge driver of the conflict, warfare and impoverishment of humanity - we have to call it out in public, and challenge it without feeding it.


And yet they both agree that Wealth Extraction needs 'workers.'  Both Left an d Right need 'workers' to 'grow the economy'.


What about the people?


They do not cite decent, warm hearted, intelligent, kind people, of all ages, creeds, languages, cultures and communities - the vast majority of us -  as their base. They do not claim the disabled, the vulnerable, the distressed, the wounded and maimed, the traumatised or the impoverished as their base. Where are they represented and where are their needs as yet un-met? 


All the leading adversarial parties have a minority voting base, pretending to represent the majority view.


Mutual Aid is the answer to that problem. Mutual Aid includes all the people, all the time, us together in solidarity.

21st Century


The shituation has moved on -  the issue is hierarchy and abuse of power, the issue is war, where workers murder other workers, as ordered by Wealth Extraction Lobby politicians.

The issue is genocide. The issue is Climate Disruption. The issue is impoverishment. The issue is curated weaponised bigotry. 


The issue is lethal bullying and that must be stopped.


These are global issues, because they are symptoms of systemic, cultural, embedded and normalised adversarial dynamics operating within every modern State, and operating between States. It is insane behaviour. It is causing intolerable harms.

An adversarial approach has no hope of dealing with these issues safely. It is not possible to solve problems like this using adversarial approaches.

Humane Solidarity is our Superpower.


I see the emergence of another political stance - Mutual Aid, Egalitarian Justice, Deliberative Democracy, Devolved Power based on honesty about the evidence and what it means. Emerging from the population rather than the existing hierarchies. Grand words, sweeping generalisations some would say. I would argue the opposite. Mutual Aid is helping each other. It immediately challenges the Adversarial Dynamic.

Egalitarian Justice is full public accountability of all elected officials, so that any corrupt behaviour is a criminal offence, with a prison term. Betray the people, pay the price. Same laws apply to everyone, nobody is above the Law, overtly or covertly.

Deliberative Democracy is where the people who are to be impacted by a policy are part of the discussion, with a view to prevention of avoidable harm to their welfare and security, informing policy and changing it where it needs changing, in order to meet their needs.

Devolved Power is about decentralising political power and the institutions of state, so that they are among the people, a workforce of the people, carrying out the day to day administration of good governance.

Working together rather than factions working against each other.

The constant adversarial struggles for power are exhausting. 


The constant harm causation is exhausting. 


The daily awareness of what is being done to innocent people as we go about our day is exhausting. 


Being a witness to all of this is exhausting.

Going through it as ones daily lived experience is intolerable, a living hell. Beyond exhausting.

We, the exhausted witnesses, are in the easier place to mobilise as a political lobby to challenge the adversarial dynamic.

We are exhausted.

A new term emerges, Continuous Traumatic Distress, where the events that cause distress are always imminent and there is no safety. 


The lived experience of a Genocide is a situation where masses of people are forced to endure continued imminent threat to their lives, in an unpredictable way, without end. Every minute presents a potential threat, many live wounded and maimed, and they endure. 


And we witness from a distance, living in the States enabling all of that. We know we are safe, and that the Palestinians, the Congolese, the Sudan, the Royhuinga and others are not safe at all, they are millions upon millions of innocent people, families, communities, towns and cities of people who are enduring warfare, caught in the crossfire,  and worse facing a clear genocide. 


What can we do to stop all of this? 


What part of our State must we rein in to cease this activity within our polity, our country?


Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs misleads.


Another Icon on Western thought turns out to be a deliberately misleading ideal. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs is a logical fallacy, an inversion of the reality about culture and human needs. Maslow spent time amongst the SikSika or Blackfoot Nation of Turtle Island, and found a highly functioning egalitarian society where personal possession of wealth was not considered superior, rather it was considered inferior. 


Sharing what one has was deemed the normal and healthy behaviour by all, and the more one shared, the better in that everyones physical and cultural and habitual needs were always met.


Furthermore the way they related to their children was not about what the children would become, it was all about the children as they are, as they present, already fully a person, already self actualised. 


This tiktok talks us through the basics. 


I invite you, dear reader, to also read the full article, from www.resilience.org , for more detail, it really is quite fascinating and makes for some healthy common sense, from a decent persons point of view, in any language or culture.

@diet_communism Replying to @Luke STRAP IN, THIS IS A LONG ONE! what other things were misrepresented when they were taught to us? #maslow #firstnations #psychology ♬ original sound - el



Self-care matters

I don’t blame myself for feeling any of these feelings, for feeling disempowered, impotent, angry, outraged, hopeful, hopeless, sad, depressed when meeting all of this. These are natural feelings to feel in this shituation. 


Regulating how I relate to, how I treat those feelings and emotions matters because it helps me to center myself, it helps me sustain whatever little effortI make in a more balanced manner. It reduces the likelihood of burn-out. I hope it makes my efforts more sustainable.

This is true doe all of us witnessing and dissenting and resisting and organising and not turning away.

We need to take our own self care, and that of our friends, family, neighbours ours and communities, apply it gently and firmly as part of the overall effort. Solidarity within our communities. A solidarity of compassion, heart, warmth and intelligence, feeding our efforts.

Perhaps this is another spring from which a trickle of active compassion can maybe become a river, with lakes and feed the sea of humane organised living, a healthy human species.  Humane Solidarity is our superpower.


The Peace Protests continue, the environmental protests continue, people are mobilising at pace, it all takes time, and that time between witness and action and resolution is painful precisely because we are witnessing the harms and our human empathy is intact.


Know that the most human and humane will to be free from oppression and dominance behaviour is inextinguishable. 



Kindest regards

Corneilius

Thank you for reading this blog.

"Do what you love, it is your gift to universe."

This blog, like all my other content creation work is not monetised via advertising. If you like what I present, consider sharing my content. If you can afford the price of a cup of coffee or a pint of beer/ale/cider for a few months, please donate via my Patreon account.

https://patreon.com/corneilius - donations gratefully received

https://www.reverbnation.com/corneilius - .mp3 songs

https://www.soundcloud.com/coreluminous - .wav Songs

https://www.corneilius.net - Archive

#folkmusic
#singersongwriter
#blogger
#music

How do we talk about the unspeakable : the necessity of Raw Truth as part of our advocacy for Survivors.

How do we talk about the unspeakable, atrocities that are perpetrated in war and …other forms of abuse and violence perpetrated against vulnerable populations..?



31,000 known murders, many more buried under the rubble, 2 million people facing deliberately imposed starvation, a call for ceasefire repeatedly ignored, billions witness the disgusting violence and maiming on their mobile phones.


Judith Herman has written on this in her book ‘Trauma and Recovery - The Aftermath of Violence - From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Lewis_Herman


"“In order to escape accountability for his crimes, the perpetrator does everything in his power to promote forgetting. If secrecy fails, the perpetrator attacks the credibility of his victim. If he cannot silence her absolutely, he tries to make sure no one listens.” 


“The conflict between the will to deny horrible events and the will to proclaim them aloud is the central dialectic of psychological trauma.” 

― Judith Lewis Herman, Trauma and Recovery: 


“The ORDINARY RESPONSE TO ATROCITIES is to banish them from consciousness. Certain violations of the social compact are too terrible to utter aloud: this is the meaning of the word unspeakable.


Atrocities, however, refuse to be buried. Equally as powerful as the desire to deny atrocities is the conviction that denial does not work. Folk wisdom is filled with ghosts who refuse to rest in their graves until their stories are told. Murder will out. Remembering and telling the truth about terrible events are prerequisites both for the restoration of the social order and for the healing of individual victims.


The conflict between the will to deny horrible events and the will to proclaim them aloud is the central dialectic of psychological trauma. People who have survived atrocities often tell their stories in a highly emotional, contradictory, and fragmented manner that undermines their credibility and thereby serves the twin imperatives of truth-telling and secrecy. When the truth is finally recognized, survivors can begin their recovery. But far too often secrecy prevails, and the story of the traumatic event surfaces not as a verbal narrative but as a symptom.


The psychological distress symptoms of traumatized people simultaneously call attention to the existence of an unspeakable secret and deflect attention from it. This is most apparent in the way traumatized people alternate between feeling numb and reliving the event. The dialectic of trauma gives rise to complicated, sometimes uncanny alterations of consciousness, which George Orwell, one of the committed truth-tellers of our century, called "doublethink," and which mental health professionals, searching for calm, precise language, call "dissociation." It results in protean, dramatic, and often bizarre symptoms of hysteria which Freud recognized a century ago as disguised communications about sexual abuse in childhood. . . .” 


― Judith Lewis Herman, Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence - From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror

https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/542700

The only way to describe atrocity is to describe EXACTLY what happens, for example, when a missile strikes a house, followed by another.


What happens in the milliseconds of explosion, fireball, blast wave, air suction and what that did to the peoples bodies in those moments, and what happens when the building collapses, what that does to the bodies on the moments, what happens when the collapse completes, what happens to the bodies crushed, what happens to the survivors, and their thoughts and feelings and sensations before, during and afterwards...


We can then listen to the first responders, neighbours and others who rush into help in what ever way they can, in particular when all they have are their hands and bodies to move rubble, extract survivors and bodies, take them to hospitals etc, etc, etc....


And then describe the way the person issuing the targeting command, location and number of missiles, and his or her command chain, and what happens when they clock off, and go home to their comfortable homes, to cook meals, play with their children, watch a movie, go to sleep, wake up and do it again.


Multiplied by the number of people adversely affected and all the down stream harms that follow, listening carefully to the survivors because their lived experience is first hand evidence  of what that was like...


We could also talk about the designers of the missiles, what research they did, how they tested the missiles, who they understood exactly what their designs do to people and buildings...


There are no adjectives to describe this. Just the raw honest data.


Justice and Repair

Judith Herman has recently published a follow up book looking at how Survivors think and feel about justice.

https://basicbooks.uk/titles/judith-herman/truth-and-repair/9781529395006/

“From one of America’s most influential psychiatrists, an “extraordinary” and “profound” ( New York Times ) manifesto for reimagining justice for survivors of sexual trauma


The #MeToo movement brought worldwide attention to sexual violence, but while the media focused on the fates of a few notorious predators who were put on trial, we heard far less about the outcomes of those trials for the survivors of their abuse. 

  

The conventional retributive process fails to serve most survivors; it was never designed for them. Renowned trauma expert Judith L. Herman argues that the first step toward a better form of justice is simply to ask survivors what would make things as right as possible for them. In Truth and Repair , she commits the radical act of listening to survivors. Recounting their stories, she offers an alternative vision of justice as healing for survivors and their communities. 

  

Deeply researched and compassionately told, Truth and Repair envisions a new path to justice for all.”


Survivors and Justice - a story of resilience, persistence, determination and humane spirit.


Here is a astonishing story of one person who was kidnapped as a child having already been sexually assaulted by neighbours, unbeknownst to his parents, because he was unable to speak.


https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2024/mar/25/at-four-i-was-kidnapped-and-sex-trafficked-for-years-now-i-fight-for-the-powerless-and-win-every-case


"Although it happened more than 60 years ago, Antonio Salazar-Hobson remembers every detail of his kidnapping. He says that if he closes his eyes, he is instantly taken back to that hot Sunday afternoon in 1960 when he was a four-year-old boy standing with his brothers and sisters in the red dust of his back yard on the outskirts of Phoenix, Arizona.

Nearby, at the bottom of a short passageway connecting the back yard to the road out of town, a car is idling.

A white man is leaning out of the window, calling Salazar-Hobson’s name. He is very afraid of this man and the woman sitting next to him in the passenger seat. His older brother and sister are also afraid. They have been told by their parents, who are out working in the fields, that they must not let Salazar-Hobson go anywhere with the couple in the car. He can hear the fear in their voices as they call out: “Thank you very much, but Antonio can’t come for ice-cream.”

Then, suddenly, the man is out of the car and moving at astonishing speed towards them. As the children stand frozen with terror, he swoops down on Salazar-Hobson, lifting him up and carrying him away. He throws him into the backseat and the car accelerates away, leaving his brothers and sisters screaming in the dust. In just a few hours, the car will have crossed over the border into California. It will be another 24 years before Salazar-Hobson sees his family again.

What happens to Salazar-Hobson in the time between his kidnapping and his return to his family is so horrifying that it is almost impossible to comprehend. After being snatched from his back yard, he is taken into a nightmarish landscape of sex trafficking, violence and exploitation, where the rest of his early life is spent in an endless loop of fear, pain and loneliness. 

Yet Salazar-Hobson’s story is so much more than the evil that was done to him. Rather than being broken by what he experienced, he instead rose from the ashes of his stolen childhood to accomplish extraordinary academic feats and become one of the US’s most successful labour rights attorneys, representing vulnerable and powerless communities, and dedicating his life to justice and compassion. “I chose not to be obliterated by the abuse and trauma I was forced to endure,” he says. “Instead of being swallowed by the darkness, I survived by walking towards the light.”"

Antonio when he was a young boy, working on the ranch.Photograph: Courtesy of Salazar-Hobson’s family phot


In Ireland the necessary process of Justice and Repair has been underway for 40 years and is as yet unfinished.  Many, many Institutions of Care entrusted to State and Church covered up the most egregious predation of innocents, men, women and children which enabled the predators to continue to cause avoidable harms to hundreds of thousands of vulnerable innocents for 70 years and more, since the inception of the Irish State.



Kindest regards

Corneilius

Thank you for reading this blog.

"Do what you love, it is your gift to universe."

This blog, like all my other content creation work is not monetised via advertising. If you like what I present, consider sharing my content. If you can afford the price of a cup of coffee or a pint of beer/ale/cider for a few months, please donate via my Patreon account.

https://patreon.com/corneilius - donations gratefully received

https://www.reverbnation.com/corneilius - .mp3 songs

https://www.soundcloud.com/coreluminous - .wav Songs

https://www.corneilius.net - Archive

#folkmusic
#singersongwriter
#blogger
#music

Letter to all elected members of Irish Dail and Seanad regarding South Africa's application the the ICJ

Who the hell votes against a ceasefire in a Genocide?


Mike Pence, former US Vice President, signing artillery shells in Southern Israel last week.




Dear representative,

The South African Government has made an application to the International Court of Justice, which rules on serious criminal offences between States, to initiate an indictment of the State of Israel for its current violent assault upon the people of Gaza, and the West Bank. They are asking that the courts rule on the situation, to charge it as an act of Genocide, to demand that all states party to the Genocide Convention take action to prevent this genocide from continuing, as International Law requires.

Ireland has ratified the Genocide Convention, as has South Africa and Israel, and most States around the world that form up the United Nations General Assembly.

It follows then, that the Irish Government, as a member of the UN, and in recognition of the long oppression of Irish people carried out by the English State and our in depth understanding of the history and adverse impacts of colonial conquest and genocidal actions designed to destroy the culture of the Irish, our language, our customs, culture, land tenure and polity by the English State, and later the British Empire, should support this application to the International Courts of Justice.

Can you please confirm that you will be taking the appropriate action to require the Irish State to uphold the Convention on Genocide, and other International Laws of War and the Humanitarian Law and join the South African application, to support it in full, without reservation?

Kindest regards

Corneilius Crowley (Irish Citizen)


----


I think that Offensive Militarism is psychopathy institutionalised. It MUST be dismantled. 


----

Here follows a brief interview with International Human Rights Lawyer Francis Boyle, who has taken and won a number of adjudications at the International Court Of Justice, regarding  Herzogovinia/Bosnia and Yugoslavia.




Kindest regards

Corneilius

Thank you for reading this blog.

"Do what you love, it is your gift to universe."

This blog, like all my other content creation work is not monetised via advertising. If you like what I present, consider sharing my content. If you can afford the price of a cup of coffee or a pint of beer/ale/cider for a few months, please donate via my Patreon account.

https://patreon.com/corneilius - donations gratefully received

https://www.reverbnation.com/corneilius - .mp3 songs

https://www.soundcloud.com/coreluminous - .wav Songs

https://www.corneilius.net - Archive

#folkmusic
#singersongwriter
#blogger
#music

An open letter, in response to Irish Government's 'Survivor Engagement' process, in preparation for a Public Inquiry into Irish Schools, and abuse of children on an industrial scale.

Child abuse within Irelands School Systems, Care Systems operated by Catholic clergy and others.

Most people by now are aware that Ireland has been going through a difficult process of coming to terms with a 7 decades long culture of abuse and violence within Institutional Care Settings. This process started in 1986. It has been a difficult and imperfect process, and is now supported by the majority of the Irish population.

There is a Survivor Engagement process underway, being carried out by the Irish Government, driven by recent revelations of the extent of child sexual abuse within Irish Boarding and Day Schools, operated by Church bodies. More about that later.

I am a survivor of 5 Boarding schools.

The engagement process, which I subscribed to when it was announced, reached out to me recently.

I responded to a recent letter from the Survivor Engagement Lead, Keiran McGrath.

My response, an open letter, is posted below, and what I have written here is an introduction, a lead into that letter. I want readers to understand why I wrote this letter. I admit my knowledge on this matter is incomplete - no single Survivor can hold all of it, I am neither an academic nor a professional advocate. I am a Survivor. 

Readers can scroll down to the letter, and skip the introduction, if you have some knowledge of the history of this matter. Dear readers, you can also alert me any to errors and mistakes I have made via the comments section. Thank you for taking the time to read through this.

Here are three videos which I think give a sense of the history and tone of this matter, and the current situation.

Deputy Ruairi Quinn speaking on the Ryan Report on the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse 2009, after a decade of Inquiry.



A Survivor, Micheal O'Brien, on Questions and Answers, an RTE broadcast programme, speaks to the adversarial approach of the Irish Government, in their handling of Inquiries into Child Abuse within Irish 'Care' systems over 7 decades, 2009.


David Ryan, Survivor, speaks on RTE Late Late Show December 9th 2023 




Emergence of Survivors seeking Justice and accountability, for Child Sexual Violence within Irish Boarding Schools, and how those matters were treated by State and Church. 


This astonishing, harrowing appearance on RTE's Late Late Show, by Mark and David Ryan, two brothers, assaulted by the same priest, Father Tom  O'Byrne, Holy Ghost Fathers, over an extended period in the 1970s marked an important, and some would say, historical turn. Their appearance before the nation on prime time TV, on one of the senior talk shows, made headlines.  That said their call back in 2002 to indict one of their abusers ought to have had the same effect. 21 Years they have waited for this to happen.

For many years neither brother spoke of their abuse, not even to each other or their parents, until early 2002 when clerical child sexual abuse filled the news headlines.

This led the brothers to reveal their abuse, first to their parents, and then to one another.

They made statements to the Gardaí (Irish Police Force) which led to multiple charges being brought against their abuser.

By then, Fr O’Byrne was 82-years-old and still living on the grounds of Blackrock College.

He denied the charges made against him and launched a legal case, seeking to halt criminal proceedings.

In 2007, the courts decided that the criminal case against the brothers’ abuser should be halted, as it would cause this old, old man much distress, and not serve the Public Good to proceed with a prosecution. Fr O’Byrne died in 2010, having never had to face trial. The Judge, Judge Adrian Hardiman, was an alumni of Belvedere, another college operated by The Holy Ghost. This was a Judicial error. 

Mary Carolan, writing in the Irish Times on September 6th, 2012, 6 years later about a review/audit of the Holy Ghost Fathers, as they were known at the time (they have 'rebranded' as 'The Spiritans' since then) which indicated the following - 

"A REVIEW of child safeguarding practices in the Holy Ghost congregation has found "unacceptable failures" over decades to protect children from 47 alleged abusing priests in its schools here.

The Catholic Church’s child protection watchdog, the National Board for Safeguarding Children (NBSC), also expressed “grave concerns” that an abuser removed from ministry in 1995 was on an internet forum just last year. Another, unknown to the congregation leaders, was until recently engaged in temporary ministry despite not having the order’s required clearance document.

A total of 142 allegations of abuse by Holy Ghost or Spiritan priests were made between 1975 and 1994, but suspected abusers were often moved, within Ireland or abroad, provoking concern that other victims had yet to come forward here or in countries such as the US, Canada and Sierra Leone, the review noted.

The order’s files made “very sad reading”, it said. There were “unacceptable failures” to prevent abuse that children “could have been spared if action was taken” and the congregation’s current leadership had to carry the responsibility for those past failures.

One “prolific abuser”, who abused children over 13 years and was removed from ministry in 1995, was found on an internet forum in 2011. Despite concerns raised about the priest within three years of the abuse starting, he continued to abuse children for a further 10 years.

Another priest who abused 28 children between 1968 and 1993 was removed from ministry only in 1996. He has since died.

Files provided to the NBSC by the Spiritans showed serial abusers in schools “went undetected and unchecked, giving them unmonitored access to children during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s”.

Of the 47 priests about whom allegations were made between 1975 and 1994, just eight are still alive, with three out of ministry. Three Spiritans have been convicted of abuse."

So more than a decade ago, the matter was raised, yet again, and it appears that justice and accountability in public has been evaded. The Spiritans have typically operated on a case by case basis, in private, settling with Survivors, with clauses demanding confidentiality and immunity from further legal action. Managing Survivors to protect the Institution. This stance is intolerable.

A true Christian, and indeed any decent human being would admit the fault, provide full access to the documentary trails, contained in their files, as a matter of transparency, honesty and genuine, meaningful remorse.

The Ryan brothers story, and others we know about, which have been in the public domain for decades, are the tip of a massive iceberg.

The appearance on the Late Late Show, by the Mark and David Ryan, who were hailed as 'immensely courageous' for taking that step, in which they were given a standing ovation by the studio audience, followed on from the RTE Radio Documentary 'Blackrock Boys' broadcast on November 7th, 2023, produced by Liam O'Brien. That started the current situation. Historic courage and indeed, humility.

Following on from that radio documentary, starting on 8th November, Joe Duffy's Live Line radio show took up the story, running for 9 episodes, until 18th November, with multiple Survivors speaking of their experiences, their abuse and the reaction of both State and Church, which they all considered to have failed to address the matter correctly, let alone honestly.

Apart from the harrowing stories Survivors told, their stories revealed that it is likely that many hundreds of children were assaulted in just one Boarding School, with estimates that 21% of one year group in 1979 had endured profound abuse, sexual assault physical violence, psychological and emotional coercive abuse.

This speaks to a culture of violence  and a culture of protective cover-up, that there clearly was an awareness of the malign behaviour of these abusive clerics amongst the Holy Ghost Congregations high officials, who adopted a reactionary defensive stance which in turn enabled these abusers to continue to abuse children.

Two current issues have emerged from this recent developments, in terms of State and Church Institutional response to the 'sudden' appearance of Survivors speaking in public, as they have done.

One being a Restorative Justice process crafted by a group of Blackrock College Past Pupils seeking a public apology for the abuse and the lack of accountability from The Spiritans (formerly The Holy Ghost Fathers), funded by The Spiritans, who are working with Past Pupils and Survivors. 

The second being the matter of Survivors, Survivors Advocates and the wider populations call for a full Public Inquiry into Child Abuse to cover all Irish Boarding and Day Schools, since the inception under the Irish State, 1926. These Schools were operated by the Church, received funding from the Irish Government since the get-go. As Survivors age, the imperative to hold those Institutions to account before we pass away, often too early, often after decades of distress is clear.

The former matter, Restorative Justice, is understood by many Survivor groups, and their advocates as inadequate, in that it is a process that is usually activated when someone who has been convicted of a crime of harm shows due remorse, where the people victimised want to help bring the assailant towards rehabilitation as part of their recovery from the harm caused to them.  With this in mind, the previous defensive stance of The Spiritans remains intact. They had made a public apology, but have not yet fully acknowledged the scale of harms caused by their stance thus far. This remains a concern, that such an acknowledgement is yet to emerge.

Restoration after an open and transparent admission of responsibility, for all the harms caused, in good faith, must not be utilised as a defence of the culpable party, but as a meaningful social and material attempt to heal, by both parties. To restore peace.

That said, some Survivors have taken up the Restorative Justice process that The Spiritans have started. The work done by past pupils to gain this has been an important part of the current developments. To the extent that the Restorative Justice process can handle a few cases, rather than look at the whole, it has obvious limitations.

The latter item, a Public Inquiry into the School systems of Ireland since 1926, is deemed by most people looking at this to be essential.

Previous Inquiries

There have been three previous major extensive Public Inquiries in Ireland - Ryan, Ferns, and Murphy, looking at the response to allegations and proven cases of abuse within residential care institutions overseen and funded by The State, operated by The Churches.

There have been campaigns and reports that focused on Industrial Schools, Mothers and Babies homes, Mental Health Asylums and The Magdalene Launderies, all residential institutions, operated by the Church, funded and overseen by the State.

In spite of regular public calls from Survivors, no Public Inquiry into the School system in general, and Boarding Schools in particular, has been considered by the Irish Government, up to 2022/23.

Irish Government response.

In the days and weeks following these media events in 2022, the Irish Government acknowledged the matter and paid heed to  Survivors call for a Public Inquiry. The Irish Government made a number of commitments to make this Public Inquiry happen, stating in March 2023 that it would ensure the Public Inquiry was 'survivor led' and set a deadline of 9 months to prepare for it.

They have initiated a 'Scoping Exercise', to engage with Survivors, to assess the number of cases, to gather more information to feed into a future Public Inquiry. This exercise is aimed at the 220 Survivors who have contacted the Government. It is well understood that there are many, many more Survivors, across Ireland and among the Irish Diaspora who have not spoken of their experience. What Survivors need is a process that is demonstrably safe, a place guided by proven expertise, a space where Survivors can share insight and solidarity as a demographic. We are a significant sector of Irish Society.

I had contacted the Irish Government and asked to be considered for inclusion in this engagement. 

My stance, as a Survivor, of five Irish Boarding Schools, is that a Public Inquiry is necessary.  I can speak to the culture of violence and abuse in all five of those Boarding Schools. How could I not seek an Inquiry into the whole, when the parts I experienced were so atrocious?

A brief look at a timeline, published by the Irish Times,  from 1986 - 2011 of the emergence of Survivors of Child Sexual Assault, Violence and psychological abuse, as a group seeking Justice and Accountability within Ireland, shows that time and time again, Government and Church evaded the issue in relation to Boarding and Day Schools, where the Church Congregations have taken an aggressively defensive stance. 

All of this, and more, is the background to the current situation.

My experience of Survivor Engagement.

I have had no communications to me from the Survivor Engagement team until last week.  I had viewed Government website pages and read announcements on the matter. I received two posted letters, the first to apologise that they were unable to deliver emails to me, as they were returned, due to failure to arrive or find my email address.

The second letter was to set out the parameters of the next stages of the Survivor Engagement Scoping Exercise, and invite me to participate. This is the document referred to.

It appears to me to be the case that no Survivors nor Survivor Advocacy nor Survivor Support Expertise with experience of these matters has been consulted by the Irish Government, since December 2022, let alone since March this year, when the Government announced their intention to prepare for a Public Inquiry, to carry out a scoping enquiry to inform their deliberations, in spite of frequent efforts and communications by Survivors to assert their right and their status as Survivors to direct, inform and guide Government on the process, as equals, as a 'survivor led' process, from the get-go.

Today I have learned that two people brought in as consultants to the Government, Mary O'Toole and Keiran McGrath appear to have relevant experience. However I am unaware of any Survivors or Survivor advocacy expertise involved in this process. The Government website shows updates have been made on 30th May.

Onevoice.ie 

Mark Vincent Healy, a Survivor and long time survivor's activist and advocate set up a web portal to foster a Survivors solidarity access point, https://www.onevoice.ie/about.html

Mark-Vincent has been in frequent communications with Government ministers and officials on this matter since November 2022. His attempts to gain a foothold for Survivors within the 'Engagement' process have been set aside, as can be seen, reading the correspondence between Mark-Vincent Healy and Government officials.

Three months later and from my perspective, Survivors remain practically excluded from informing or designing the Survivor Engagement process. 

It would appear the Irish Government wants data from Survivors, but not advice on how best to proceed. I could be wrong. I may well be missing something. If I am, I want to be much better informed. I do not see how the current process is Survivor led. Government announcements, their terms of reference, thus far have not clarified this in terms that meet my un-met needs as a Survivor.

I read their proposed process, as outlined in the letter, and I found it to be inadequate, unsafe and ill-prepared, and I wrote the following reply:

Open Letter : A Survivor Responds to Irish Government Survivor Engagement Scoping Exercise.

To whom it may concern,

I received two letters from Survivor Engagement Lead, Keiran McGrath, last week, on 25th and 26th of May.

The first explained that attempts to contact me via Email had failed. I have sent numerous emails to Government Ministers, and to the Taoiseach, and have received acknowledgements, so I have no idea why my email was not functioning. Nonetheless I was glad to receive the letter.

The second letter contained more details concerning the Irish Government Survivor Engagement process, in preparation for the establishment of a Public Inquiry into Historic Child Abuse within Irish Boarding and Day Schools. and the response of Institutions, with a copy of the Governments published document indicating how they intended to engage with Survivors. 

You can read their proposal here, which was sent with that letter:

https://www.gov.ie/pdf/258753/?page=null

I will quote from their document  - "In the first instance the Survivor Engagement process will endeavor to explore key matters that need to be addressed."

'Endeavor to explore' seems to me to suggest an unlikely scenario - that Church and State do not already have knowledge and understanding of the previous delays and failures to hold those responsible to account. 

Both parties know this, because they have caused the delays. Survivors know, because we have endured them. The pain, despair and frustration resulting is an everyday experience for Survivors.

As to 'addressing key matters' how does a bland questionnaire seeking private and traumatic information on crimes, without evidence that the psychological and material health support such reporting usually demands is present and at scale, help at this stage? What is being addressed by this questionnaire?

I note that the document mentions Trauma Informed Facilitators, as interfacing with Survivors, collecting this information, without providing the accreditation of same. What precisely is a trauma informed facilitator? What qualifications and experience are deemed adequate by Government?

Is this a questionnaire a process Survivors can trust in? 

From my perspective, it is not.

The key matters that must be addressed, from the start, before canvassing Survivors in the ill-thought out manner suggested, are the following:

1. Admission and acknowledgement of previous errors, mistakes, failures and delays by Government, in responding to and delivering on Survivors calls for Justice, as part of understanding how to avoid avoidable harms. 

2. A published declaration and commitment to avoiding avoidable harm to Survivors, to meet in full their un-met needs, as we step into the future.

3. The establishment of a Survivors Expert Panel, to act as a channel between all Survivors, as a Demographic of the Irish Population, and Government - to enable equity at the table between Government and Survivors, to reduce the Power Disparity between State and Survivors, in the establishment of a Public Inquiry, including setting out the tasks of such an Inquiry. No individual Survivor has all the resources that such a body, correctly set up, would be able to marshal, on behalf of Survivors.

Once these are in place, Survivors can proceed, on the understanding that Survivors have established an equal status with Government, that Government is wholly committed to avoiding avoidable harms to Survivors or to their interests, to avoid repeating past errors, and that Survivors and their professional advocates and relevant expertise will be listened to, they will be heard and their expertise, skill and insight will be properly integrated into the design and implementation of this Public Inquiry.

In essence, establishing a safe space, where one has not existed before, so that Survivors can direct Government on how best to meet the un-met needs of the children they were, and un-met needs of the adults they have had to become, aware of the heavy costs of their endurance of trauma and abuse and lack of justice.

Just to be clear, I will pose the question "What are Survivors Rights?"

In reply, ' To have our un-met needs for justice and accountability met, to have social and material support put in place, acknowledging the wounds we carry, the impact of years of abuse and decades of cover-up has had on our lives, and on the lives of our families and their communities. There is no repair of the harm caused possible. Harms of this egregious nature cannot be undone. 

Nonetheless, Justice, Legal, Criminal and Civil Accountability and an accurate, honest history can be achieved, and this will go much of the way in meeting Survivors needs.

In short, having our un-met needs met, is each and every Survivors Human Right.'

These are our rights. This is not a matter of what Government will do to/for Survivors, it is a question of whether or not Government will listen to, hear and integrate Survivors input and take it on board and thus work with Survivors as equals at the table. That said, Survivors are the seniors in this matter, Government very much the juniors.

Having established that the Government understands all of this, given that thus far, the evidence suggests otherwise, we can and should proceed.

As to the 'data the government seeks', at this early/late stage... 

To start with, the limited number of Survivors who have contacted Government on an individual basis, , who are described in the letter as 'complainants', is unlikely to be representative or even indicative of the whole Survivor demographic, living and deceased. The Government's stated objective of finding out how many 'complainants' are out there cannot be met in this manner.

Secondly, the questionnaire seeks to understand how many schools are involved, by asking Survivor Complainants to indicate which schools they were abuse within - we know already that a culture of violence and abuse prevailed across every institutional setting operated by Clergy.  It must be assumed that all such institutional settings will fall under the scope of the Public Inquiry. The Inquiry is the forum to search for and extract that data.

Thirdly, the questionnaire will ask of Survivors, the role or job or position of those who abused them. At this stage, this data is irrelevant. It will become relevant once a safe process of Survivor testimony is established to feed into the Inquiry.

Fourthly, the questionnaire will ask if the 'complainant' has approached TUSLA or Gardai, or any other relevant Institutions? This too will become more relevant as data is gathered, through a safe process, designed by Survivor advocates and expertise, working with Government Officials.

Then the letter proceeds to suggest Survivors could have their information included in the Report, anonymised. Would Survivors have editorial control of such inclusions, to ensure their perspective and context were maintained?

The last paragraph tell us Survivors that we should understand that what we are being asked to do will 'contribute to making Irish Schools and Education safer for children and young people.' The implicit assumption is that Survivors will go along with the existing process, with this noble objective in mind. It is glib and manipulative. 

As a Survivor, I'm quite sure Irish Schools are safer than ever before. I do believe that what was done to me will not be done to children within the Irish School system today.

The matter at hand is not just about the future of Irish Schools, it is in the immediate sense about the present and future of thousands of living survivors of child sexual assault, physical assault, psychological and emotional assault, within educational care settings.
  
The matter at hand is the most honest account of the past of those who have died early as a result, who cannot seek justice and accountability, whose case must not be brushed aside.

It is the future of Irish Society as it acknowledges the historic crimes, the culture of cruelty within the State and the Church, which enabled thousands of crimes perpetrated against innocent children on an industrial scale, and it sets a course for Justice for Survivors, accountability of the culpable before the democratic body of the people, reparations and life support for aging Survivors, who form up a significant demographic of The Irish people.

This current initiative is not safe, is neither Survivor led or Survivor informed. It has been designed by officials with limited relevant experience in this field.

I cannot participate in the current offered process, and do so in good faith. I do not trust it.

Kindest Regards

Corneilius Crowley, Survivor, 5 Irish Catholic Boarding Schools, 1965 -1977

London, England.

Update 31/5/23 - I was contacted by phone, from the Department of Education, seeking to check whether or not I wish to continue 'engaging'. I said I was willing to continue, and I made my concerns clear, that Survivors needed more than a questionnaire, that we needed a Survivors Panel to represent our side in the planning of the Public Inquiry, setting out the task of the Public Inquiry.  The person I was speaking to was an admin within the Department and could not speak to my concerns. I said I understood that, and that I hoped the message would filter up the chain.


Kindest regards

Corneilius

Thank you for reading this blog.

"Do what you love, it is your gift to universe."

This blog, like all my other content creation work is not monetised via advertising. If you like what I present, consider sharing my content. If you can afford the price of a cup of coffee or a pint of beer/ale/cider for a few months, please donate via my Patreon account.

https://patreon.com/corneilius - donations gratefully received

https://www.reverbnation.com/corneilius - .mp3 songs

https://www.soundcloud.com/coreluminous - .wav Songs

https://www.corneilius.net - Archive

#folkmusic
#singersongwriter
#blogger
#music