There are abusers - people who intentionally and deliberately exploit, abuse and cause harm to other people - in every political party, in every office, in every military unit, in every school, every temple.
Bullying is a standard behavioural dynamic in hierarchical situations.
Bullies in the office, predators in the Church or the Swim Club, manipulators among the family, domestic violence, abuse of power disparity, corruption and warfare are all part of the same behavioural dynamic.
And so, if we are honest then when it comes to child abuse we all know that there are abusers in many, many family homes, just as there are abusers in many institutional settings, be they left, right, centrist, secular, religious or apolitical.
So here's the honest evidence - The vast majority of child abuse is perpetrated against children by people they know, often trusted people within their family network or their community.
Stranger attack is relatively rare by comparison, and, yes it is still a genuine threat, something to be aware of - it does happen. Child Sexual Abuse most often involves the infiltration of a circle of trust, the grooming of target and bystanders alike a standard behaviour. That uncle you all trusted, the political conman who was trusted....
Using the issue of child abuse as a partisan political weapon does not help confront the truth of abuse in general and child abuse in particular as it stands within this culture. That is problematic.
So I choose to name the culture - Hierarchical Industrialised Militarised Competing Powers (HIMCOP) - and I see it as a series of behaviour patterns, behavioural dynamics that become institutionalised around the need to gain and maintain power over others. I do not see it as 'natural healthy human behaviour'.
I think using CSA as a political weapon inhibits a full confrontation with the social material situation.
I have found this to be the case, from decades of confronting the abuse I endured, turning abuse in to a partisan political weapon does nothing to reduce abuse, nothing to mitigate the harm or resolve the pain.
The system of power understands that when people stop arguing, and begin to listen to one another, in order to build bridges, to deepen understanding, to learn from each others experience, then the system of power is in trouble. So they do their level best to see that we ordinary folk are set o arguing against each other.
“If we accept that there will always be sides, it’s a nontrivial to-do list item to always be on the side of angels. Distrust essentialism.
Keep in mind that what seems like rationality is often just rationalization, playing catch-up with subterranean forces that we never suspect.
Focus on the larger, shared goals. Practice perspective taking. Individuate, individuate, individuate. Recall the historical lessons of how often the truly malignant Thems keep themselves hidden and make third parties the fall guy.
And in the meantime, give the right-of-way to people driving cars with the “Mean people suck” bumper sticker, and remind everyone that we’re all in it together against Lord Voldemort and the House Slytherin.”
― Robert M. Sapolsky, Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst
So lets look at some of the data, the evidence to discern some of the truth here.
An Epidemiological Overview of Child Sexual Abuse - 2014
"The WHO in 2002 estimated that 73 million boys and 150 million girls under the age of 18 years had experienced various forms of sexual violence.[1]
The Center's for Disease Control and the US Department of Justice conducted a study in the US and reported prevalence of being forced to have sex at some point of time in their lives as 11% and 4% of the high-school girls and boys, respectively.[7]
A meta-analysis conducted in the year 2009 analyzed 65 studies in 22 countries and estimated an “overall international figure.”
The main findings of the study were:[7] An estimated 7.9% of males and 19.7% of females universally faced sexual abuse before the age of 18 years[7]
The highest prevalence rate of CSA was seen in Africa (34.4%)[7,8]
Europe, America, and Asia had prevalence rate of 9.2%, 10.1%, and 23.9%, respectively[7]
With regards to females, seven countries reported prevalence rates as being more than one fifth i.e., 37.8% in Australia, 32.2% in Costa Rica, 31% in Tanzania, 30.7% in Israel, 28.1% in Sweden, 25.3% in the US, and 24.2% in Switzerland[7]
The lowest rate observed for males may be imprecise to some extent because of under reporting.[7]
The study concluded that CSA is an extensive problem and even the lowest prevalence includes a huge number of victims who still need to be considered.[7]"
The reader can read the paper, and check each of the references for him or herself.
Egalitarian cultures do not abuse children.
Hierarchy cultures do.
Dominator cultures do.
Traumatised cultures do.
source :
www.violence.deIt is that simple.
Only honesty and transparency can resolve this matter.
Honesty is evidence led, transparency is evidence available in the open, without bias. Everyone can see it all.
I think that using child abuse as a partisan political weapon is being dishonest - political weaponisation of CSA/CSE is small minded and abusive - small minded in that it does not look to the whole society level situation, and abusive in that it is exploiting suffering to make a point. - Without really thinking it through, those who fall for that false gambit end up dumping all over the work of survivors and their advocates, the people who go to court, who pursue justice diligently.
Those who use CSE/CSA as a political weapon are also dumping all over the people who work with survivors to help them 'recover' and regain some semblance of safety and balance, and and dumping over the many health professionals and care workers, trainers, mid wives and others who work to prevent child abuse.
Those who use CSA/CSE as a political weapon are exploiting the survivors, the harm caused becomes a weapon and they are inhibiting accurate and honest discourse on this subject.
Dealing with proven abusers.
Everyone who is proven be an abuser needs to be sentenced, and imprisoned, just as everyone who makes and spreads images of child abuse needs to be incarcerated, not as punishment, but as
a fundamental societal health and safety protocol.
Punishment does not prevent abuse. It's already too late by the stage of courts and convictions. It is true that incarcerated abusers are no longer able to abuse children freely. That is a useful gain in the overall picture. But it is not grass roots prevention. It is important to consider what is needed to prevent child abuse.
People who abuse children and exploit them are not safe for society. Period.
So too with War Criminals. They are not safe for society.
Tony Blair and George Bush are personally responsible for the murder of at least 250,000 children in Iraq in 2003 -2006, and they are personally responsible for the orphaning of 4 million Iraqi children.
How does that harm compare with the quantity of harms caused by Epstein or Savile, or any other case of celebrity abusers? It is certain that in each case of abuse or harm, each harmed child sees little difference, the lived experience of that and it's impacts are utterly, utterly awful.
However at the societal level there is a vast difference. This is not to suggest the Saviles and Epsteins get a free pass by comparison. Comparison is needless when we remove punishment and install humane lonfg term incarceration for social safety.
If, as the allegations suggest, Epstein's operation was about entrapment and exploitation of powerful people as a political weapon, as a political whip, then it is ironic that Qanon et al use the abuse of small, defenceless children, as a political weapon. Both would be doing the same thing.
Where is Child Sexual Abuse more common? How many more ordinary, non celebrity people rape children, most often their own, or their relatives or friends children, and are never exposed?
Neither of these questions are posed to afford celebrity abusers any excuse or mitigation. Again it's not a comparison. Those who are famous who are also proven abusers must always be exposed and safety restored by their removal and incarceration. Just as any one else.
Left/Right makes no difference: the abuse can and does happen in any political grouping or affiliation, any religious group or affiliation.
Honesty and transparency do make a difference.
Accurate data and verifiable evidence do make a difference.
Understanding the issues, the context and the evidence as a whole does make a difference.
Kindest regards
Corneilius
"Do what you love, it is your gift to universe."
